Aims and Scope

JMET - OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL

The Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (JMET) (ISSN No 2180-1053) is a journal published twice a year by Penerbit Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM). This peer-reviewed journal, organized by Fakulti Kejuruteraan Mekanikal (FKM) is used for dissemination of original and profound research in all fields on mechanical engineering and technology, by both local and international authors, aiming to present the latest development and achievements in scientific research.

A welcoming message by The Editor in Chief explains the scopes of the journal. Readers are invited to select 'Archive' where all full-text and abstract of technical papers previously published can be accessed.

Authors are invited to read the 'Manuscript Preparation' and 'Submission Info' for complete guidelines towards contributing technical paper to the journal.

Editorial Correspondence should be addressed to: 

Journal Secretariat
Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology
Fakulti Kejuruteraan Mekanikal
Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
Hang Tuah Jaya
76109 Durian Tunggal
Melaka, MALAYSIA 

Phone Number : +606 - 2346792 
Fax                   : +606 -2346884

Section Policies

Others

Editors

• Nurhidayah Ismail

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Energy Engineering

Editors

• Mohd Afzanizam Mohd Rosli

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Automotive Engineering

Editors

• Fauzi Ahmad

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Thermal Fluid

Editors

• Mahanum Mohd Zamberi

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Structure and Material Engineering

Editors

• Sivakumar Dhar Malingam

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Design and Innovation

Editors

• Nadlene Razali

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Plant and Maintenance

Editors

• Asriana Ibrahim

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Vibration and Control

Editors

• Fauzi Ahmad

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Biomechanics

Editors

• Nurhidayah Ismail

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
 
Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
 
Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

• everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of articles published in JMET; manuscripts are freely available without subscription or price barriers.
• papers are immediately released in open access format (no long waiting periods).

 Advantages of Open Access for Authors:

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in the journal and is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

DUTIES OF EDITOR

Publication decisions
The editor of the JMET is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

DUTIES OF REVIEWERS

Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

DUTIES OF AUTHORS

Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention
Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects
If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Creative Commons Licenses

Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology by Penerbit, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://journal.utem.edu.my/index.php/jmet/issue/archive.