Editorial Policies

Aims and Scope

The Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC) is a refereed journal, with the aim to publish manuscripts that contribute to the development of both theory and practice in the field of telecommunication, electronic and computer engineering. Authors are invited to submit high-quality manuscript to be published in JTEC in the areas of interest, that include, but not limited to, the following areas:

Telecommunication Engineering

  • Communication Systems 
  • RF and Microwave Devices 
  • Antenna and Propagation 
  • Satellite Communication 
  • Modulation, Coding, and Channel Analysis 
  • Remote Sensing and GPS 
  • Electromagnetics
  • Integrated Optics and Electro-optics Devices 
  • Optical Electronic Devices & Photonics 
  • Techniques of Laser and Applications Of Electro-optics 
  • Wireless Communications 
  • Other Topics in Telecommunication Engineering

Electronic Engineering

  • Artificial Intelligence 
  • Hardware & Architecture 
  • Operating System 
  • Robotic Applications 
  • Control System 
  • Biomedical & e-Health Systems 
  • Mobile Device, Platform and Applications 
  • Smart Spaces and Sensor Networks Security
  • Electronic Fabrication Testability and Reliability 
  • Sensor Technology 
  • Other Topics in Electronic Engineering

Computer Engineering

  • Algorithms 
  • Computer Architecture 
  • Data Compression 
  • Image Processing Network 
  • Information Security
  • Cryptography 
  • Mobile Computing 
  • Parallel and Distributing Computing 
  • High-Performance Computing 
  • Autonomic and Trusted Computing 
  • Software Engineering
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning 
  • Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 
  • Biomedical Informatics and Computation 
  • Signal Detection and Parameter Estimation 
  • Signal, Image and Video Processing 
  • Speech and Audio Processing 
  • VLSI 
  • System On Chip 
  • Microelectronics Fabrication 
  • MEMS and NEMS 
  • IC Design 
  • Mobile and Ubiquitous Computing 
  • Other Topics in Computer Engineering


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

The practice of peer review is to ensure that good paper is published. It is an objective process at the heart of good scholarly publishing and is carried out on all reputable scientific journals. Our referees, therefore play a vital role in maintaining the high standards of JTEC.

All manuscripts submitted for publication undergo double-blind peer review. Reviewers are unaware of the identity of the authors, and authors are also unaware of the identity of reviewers.

It is important to note that the journal may take up to approximately 6 months to process the review, acknowledgement and publication of the manuscript submitted by authors. 


Publication Frequency

From 2010 to 2015, the normal issue of the journal was published two times a year, specifically in June and December.

In 2016, the normal issue of the journal was published three times a year, namely in April, August and December.

Starting from 2017, the normal issue of the journal is published four times per year, which are in March, June, September and December.

In addition, special issues of JTEC will be published non-periodically from time to time.


Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content, based on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.


Plagiarism Policy

All articles submitted to JTEC will be checked using the Turnitin.com plagiarism detection software.


Cost of Publication

The manuscript selected to publish in the normal issue of this journal is free of charge.


Ethics and Malpractice

This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in the journal and is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.


Publication decisions
The editor of the JTEC is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.


Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.


Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention
Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects
If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

ISSN: 2180-1843

eISSN: 2289-8131