Analysis on C++ Topic Difficulties Ranking: A Case Study on Mechanical Engineering Students in UiTM Pasir Gudang

Harshida Hasmy, Nur Syafikah Ibrahim, Azyan Yusra Kapi @ Kahbi

Abstract


The aim of this paper is to analyse student’s performance obtained from the course “Fundamentals of Computer Problem Solving” (CSC128) final examination results. This is a C++ programming course and it is a mandatory subject for all Diploma in Mechanical Engineering and Diploma in Civil Engineering students at Universiti Teknologi MARA Pasir Gudang Campus. Through the analysis, this paper identify which topics in CSC128 is not being well mastered by the students.  The data was collected from 163 students score marks and the analysis was conducted by categorizing the final examination questions into five different topics according to CSC128 syllabus. An indicator has been used to classify students’ performance for each topic by comparing the percentage of students who scored 50% above and below of total marks for every topic. The study identified that Topic 4, “Repetition Control Structure” was placed in the first rank as the most difficult topic encountered by the students and Topic 3, “Selection Control Structure” was ranked as the least difficult topic. The findings will be used to improve the subject in order to achieve the course outcomes and can be a guideline for the lecturers to improve their teaching method in order to increase students’ understanding, interest and performance in programming.


Full Text:

PDF

References


M. Rahmat, S. Shahrani, R. Latih, N. F. M. Yatim, N. F. A. Zainal, and R. A. Rahman, “Major problems in basic programming that influence student performance,” Procedia-Social Behav. Sci., vol. 59, pp. 287–296, 2012.

A. Baist and A. S. Pamungkas, “Analysis of Student Difficulties in Computer Programming,” VOLT J. Ilm. Pendidik. Tek. Elektro, vol. 2, no. October, pp. 81–92, 2017.

K. A. Sarpong, J. K. Arthur, and P. Y. O. Amoako, “Causes of Failure of Students in Computer Programming Courses : The Teacher – Learner Perspective,” Int. J. Comput. Appl. (0975 – 8887), vol. 77, no. 12, pp. 27–32, 2013.

H. Rahim, H. B. Zaman, A. Ahmad, and N. M. Ali, “Student ’ s Difficulties in Learning Programming,” Adv. J. Tech. Vocat. Educ., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 40–43, 2018.

F. Mohan, “Teaching C ++ Programming as a foreign language,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Frontiers in Education: Computer Science and Computer Engineering (FECS), 2018, pp. 18–23.

Y. Qian and J. D. Lehman, “Students ’ Misconceptions and Other Difficulties in Introductory Programming : A Literature Review,” ACM Trans. Comput. Educ., vol. 18, no. February, 2017.

A. Edgcomb, F. Vahid, R. Lysecky, and S. Lysecky, “Getting students to earnestly do reading , studying , and homework in an introductory programming class,” in Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education., 2017, pp. 171–176.

N. S. Ibrahim, H. Hasmy, A. Y. Kapi, and A. Suhami, “The Usability of C++ Interactive Self-Assessment Quiz (i-SAQ),” Int. J. Hum. Technol. Interact., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 67–74, 2018.

F. L. Khaleel, N. S. Ashaari, and T. S. M. T. Wook, “An Empirical Stusy On Gamification For Learning Programming Language,” J. Teknol., vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 151–162, 2019.

A. L. Asnawi et al., “The Needs of Collaborative Tool for Practicing Pair Programming in Educational Setting,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., no. July, 2019.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN : 2590-3551, eISSN : 2600-8122     

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

Best viewed using Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome and Internet Explorer with the resolution of 1280 x 800