Application of Green Intellectual Property on Green Technology in Malaysia and Its Benefit: A Review of the Literature

M.N. Ridzuan, B.C. Chew


Intellectual property (IP) is commonly associated with a protection of an invention. Green IP exists not only due to the changing climate but also due to the sustenance of the global eco system. Developed countries such as Japan, United States, German and France have used the green intellectual property for their green technology protection. Hence, the Malaysian government should use this system as well. The objective of this paper is to analyse the implementation of Green IP in terms of social, economic and environmental aspects. The literature review consists of journals published within the year 2007 to 2017 to determine the meaning of Green IP and how it benefits Malaysia in terms of the social, economy and environmental aspects throughout the literature review. This study will enhance the development of Malaysia's standard in green technology and the development of nation growth.

Full Text:



A. Dechezleprêtre, Fast-Tracking Green Patent Applications: An Empirical Analysis. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD), 2013.

S. Chia. (2013). Making Malaysia Greener [Online]. Available:

en/assets/press/131011-msian-reserve-making-malaysia greener.pdf

WIPO. (2011). What is Intellectual Property? [Online]. Available:

D. Yang, Understanding and Profiting from Intellectual Property: A Guide for Practitioners and Analysts. UK: Palgrave Macmilan, 2008.

R. S. Krishna. (2009). Climate change, technology transfer and intellectual property rights [Online]. Available:

E. Lane, Clean Tech Intellectual Property: Eco-Marks, Green Patents, and Green Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

M. Bhardwaj, “The Advantages and Disadvantages of Green Technology,” Journal of Basic and Applied Engineering Research, vol. 2, no. 22, pp. 1957-1960, 2015.

F.M. Abbott. (2015). Transfer of Technology and a Global Clean Energy Grid [Online]. Available:

Y.N. Goh and N.A. Wahid, “A Review on Green Purchase Behaviour Trend of Malaysian Consumers,” Asian Social Science, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 103-110, 2014.

B.H. Hall and C. Helmers, “The role of patent protection in (clean/green) technology transfer,” Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal, vol. 26, pp. 487-532, 2010.

G. Henry and L.G.L. Szleper, “Intellectual Property Rights and Green Technologies,” in 42nd World Intellectual Property Congress, Paris, 2010, pp. 1-48.

A. Abdel-Latif. (2012). Intellectual Property Rights and Green Technologies from Rio to Rio: An Impossible Dialogue? [Online]. Available:

Newsweek LLC. (2016). Top 10 Green Companies in the World 2016 [Online]. Available:

A. Jolly, Clean Tech, Clean Profits: Using Effective Innovation and Sustainable Business Practices to Win in The New Low-Carbon Economy. London: Kogan Page, 2010.

J.M. Chu, “Developing and Diffusing Green Technologies: The Impact of Intellectual Property Rights and their Justification,” Washington and Lee Journal of Energy, Climate, and the Environment, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 52-102, 2012.

J. Reichman, A.K. Rai, R.G. Newell and J.B. Wiener. (2008). Intellectual property and alternatives: Strategies for green innovation [Online]. Available:

R. Pinderhughes. (2007). Green-Collar Jobs: An Analysis of the Capacity of Green Businesses to Provide High Quality Jobs for Men and Women with Barriers to Employment [Online]. Available:


M. McCarthy. (2008). Going from “Blue Collar” to “Green Collar” in Work Force Development [Online]. Available:

K.N. Adham and C. Siwar, “The Establishment of Government Green Procurement Practices in Malaysia: The Way Forward,” OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 41-50, 2012.

S.A.M. Azizan and N.M. Suki, “Consumers’ intention to purchase green product: insights from Malaysia,” World Applied Sciences Journal, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1129-1134, 2013.

D.J. Gervais. (2012). Climate Change, the International Intellectual Property Régime, and Disputes Under the TRIPS Agreement [Online]. Available: abstract=2235775

OECD. (2013). OECD Investment Policy Reviews: Malaysia [Online]. Available:

Henry Goh & Co. (2017). A Guide to the Malaysian IP System [Online]. Available:

MyIPO. (2017). Patent Prosecution Highway [Online]. Available:

J. Thøgersen, P. Haugaard and A. Olesen, “Consumer responses to ecolabels,” European Journal of Marketing, vol. 44, no. 11/12, pp. 1787–1810, 2010.

C. Mimura, Nuanced Management of IP Rights: Shaping Industry-University Relationships to Promote Social Impact (Chapter 9) in R. C Dreyfuss, H. First, D. L. Zimmerman (Eds), Working Within the Boundaries of Intellectual Property. Oxford: Oxford University, 2011.

R. Falkner, The Handbook of Global Climate and Environment Policy. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.

W. Young, K. Hwang and S. McDonald, “Sustainable consumption: green consumer behaviour when purchasing products,” Sustainable Development, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 20-31, 2010.

L. Yang and K.E. Maskus, “Intellectual Property Rights, Technology Transfer and Exports in Developing Countries,” Journal of Development Economics, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 231-236, 2009.

E.L. Lane, "Greenwashing 2.0," Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 279-281, 2013.

A.M. Omer, “Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development,” Renewable and Sustainable Reviews, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 2265-2300, 2008.

B.A. Bickart and J.A. Ruth, “Green Eco-Seals and Advertising Persuasion,” Journal of Advertising, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 51-67, 2012.

© Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology